Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases" Results 141 - 160 of 328
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2015, 10:25 pm by Jon Gelman
The other five cases are from Florida,Texas, Arizona, Washington and Georgia. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:23 am by David DePaolo
Doyle, a founding partner of the Doyle Raizner law firm, which filed both complaints, told WorkCompCentral the Arizona case already survived a motion to dismiss and he anticipates going to trial by the middle of summer. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Leonard Jernigan
The other five cases are from Florida, Texas, Arizona, Washington and Georgia. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Leonard Jernigan
The other five cases are from Florida, Texas, Arizona, Washington and Georgia. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 9:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Both the state of Arizona and the employee sued ASARCO; the cases were consolidated, and a federal jury found the employer liable for sexual harassment but not retaliation or constructive discharge. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm by Howard Wasserman
§ 1346(b)) waives sovereign immunity for personal-injury and negligence claims arising from the conduct of federal employees acting within the scope of their office or employment, giving district courts jurisdiction over claims against the United States and rendering the U.S. subject to suit and liability to the same extent a private person would be liable under state law. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
District Court for the District of Arizona 2008), . . . in which the court ruled on the application of the [Computer Fraud and Abuse Act] to conduct similar to that at issue in this case. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 11:46 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
But the Arizona court found that since the officer was only on the scene because of his employment, any injury he sustained, even if it occurred while going above-and-beyond the call of duty, was covered by the assumption of risk. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Lorene Park
In addition to the threat of significant liability, employers are plagued with a certain level of uncertainty given that this area of law is rapidly developing and new issues emerge as courts address new FCRA cases. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
Deleon 13-1516Issue: Whether it is an “adverse employment action” for a discrimination claim, or a “materially adverse action” for a retaliation claim, when an employer grants an employee's request for a job transfer. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:28 am by Lorene Park
This could also become the basis for arguments that related companies received proper notice of EEOC charges or were joint employers for purposes of liability. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 2:03 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
“Whether in the international oil industry, as in this case, or a local family-run restaurant, the Labor Department is working to ensure that responsible employers do not experience a competitive disadvantage because they play by the rules. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 4:54 pm by Ohio Employment Law Letter
” In a “sex-plus” case, like this one, in which the court finds the employee established a sufficient foundation of discrimination, the employer is not permitted to “undermine her prima facie case by showing that white women and African[-]American men received the same treatment. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The EPL coverage part of the management liability insurance policy defined “Wrongful Employment Practices” to include “wrongful failure or refusal to adopt or enforce adequate workplace or employment practices, policies or procedures. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Greg Mersol
  An Arizona district court has now granted summary judgment in favor of at least one of the putative employers on similar claims involving very different evidence. [read post]
30 May 2014, 1:37 pm by Steve Matthews
Arizona DUI lawyer, Lawrence Koplow, blogged on “What warrants a warrant? [read post]