Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases" Results 161 - 180 of 340
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
District Court for the District of Arizona 2008), . . . in which the court ruled on the application of the [Computer Fraud and Abuse Act] to conduct similar to that at issue in this case. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 11:46 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
But the Arizona court found that since the officer was only on the scene because of his employment, any injury he sustained, even if it occurred while going above-and-beyond the call of duty, was covered by the assumption of risk. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Lorene Park
In addition to the threat of significant liability, employers are plagued with a certain level of uncertainty given that this area of law is rapidly developing and new issues emerge as courts address new FCRA cases. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
Deleon 13-1516Issue: Whether it is an “adverse employment action” for a discrimination claim, or a “materially adverse action” for a retaliation claim, when an employer grants an employee's request for a job transfer. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:28 am by Lorene Park
This could also become the basis for arguments that related companies received proper notice of EEOC charges or were joint employers for purposes of liability. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 2:03 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
“Whether in the international oil industry, as in this case, or a local family-run restaurant, the Labor Department is working to ensure that responsible employers do not experience a competitive disadvantage because they play by the rules. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 4:54 pm by Ohio Employment Law Letter
” In a “sex-plus” case, like this one, in which the court finds the employee established a sufficient foundation of discrimination, the employer is not permitted to “undermine her prima facie case by showing that white women and African[-]American men received the same treatment. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The EPL coverage part of the management liability insurance policy defined “Wrongful Employment Practices” to include “wrongful failure or refusal to adopt or enforce adequate workplace or employment practices, policies or procedures. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Greg Mersol
  An Arizona district court has now granted summary judgment in favor of at least one of the putative employers on similar claims involving very different evidence. [read post]
30 May 2014, 1:37 pm by Steve Matthews
Arizona DUI lawyer, Lawrence Koplow, blogged on “What warrants a warrant? [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:31 am by Jay Yurkiw
” The court analyzed a handful of cases addressing these issues, including the January decision in In Re Actos (Pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation, No. 11-md-2299 (W.D. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm by Robert B. Milligan
Significant New Non-Compete Cases Keep Employers On Their Toes Employers were kept on their toes with some significant non-compete decisions which forced some employers to update their agreements and onboarding/exiting practices. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:27 am by Rachel E. Burke
Additionally, it reminds employers that employment decisions should be measured and well-supported by a reasonable investigation. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:03 am by Brad Hokanson
  The couple owed outstanding federal employment, unemployment, and income tax liabilities covering multiple tax years from the early 1990s through 2007. [read post]