Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases" Results 161 - 180 of 329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2014, 1:37 pm by Steve Matthews
Arizona DUI lawyer, Lawrence Koplow, blogged on “What warrants a warrant? [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:31 am by Jay Yurkiw
” The court analyzed a handful of cases addressing these issues, including the January decision in In Re Actos (Pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation, No. 11-md-2299 (W.D. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm by Robert B. Milligan
Significant New Non-Compete Cases Keep Employers On Their Toes Employers were kept on their toes with some significant non-compete decisions which forced some employers to update their agreements and onboarding/exiting practices. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:27 am by Rachel E. Burke
Additionally, it reminds employers that employment decisions should be measured and well-supported by a reasonable investigation. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:03 am by Brad Hokanson
  The couple owed outstanding federal employment, unemployment, and income tax liabilities covering multiple tax years from the early 1990s through 2007. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:25 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Beginning in 2000, the Arizona Plan’s funding ratio (assets divided by liabilities) started to decline. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
Does the law enforcement proviso to the assault-and-battery exception govern (in which case we might have liability, depending on the circuit), or is liability foreclosed by the discretionary function exemption? [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:38 am by Jason Shinn
Chamber Institute for Legal Reform found that in 2006-08 companies at the low end of the range were paying $620,000 per case, and those at the high end were paying almost $3 million per case in discovery costs. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm by Ryan Hogaboam
Washington employers have the freedom to address these justifications on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 12:16 am by Jon Gelman
Industrial Commission of Arizona, No. 1 CA-IC 12-0038 held that the North American Free Trade Agreement did not pre-empt Arizona's workers' compensation statutes and that Porteadores del Noroeste could face liability in Arizona for the additional compensation that one of its workers, Adan Valenzuela, claimed he was due.Valenzuela worked for Porteadores as a driver,... [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:21 am by David DePaolo
Miguel Millan Ramirez and additional compensation.In September 2010, Valenzuela filed an injury report with the Industrial Commission of Arizona naming Porteadores as his employer. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 6:56 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
This lawsuit illustrates that the department will use every enforcement tool necessary to resolve cases where employees are unlawfully treated as independent contractors, and vulnerable workers are not paid the minimum wage. [read post]