Search for: "Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 21 - 40
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2022, 8:08 am
City and County of San Francisco on the issue whether states could intervene to defend a... [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:03 am
City and County of San Francisco. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 7:01 am
City and County of San Francisco, No. 20-1775. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
City and County of San Francisco as improvidently granted. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:35 pm
City and County of San Francisco and Berger v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 8:00 am
City and County of San Francisco, California: The case revolves around a legal challenge to a federal immigration rule. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 12:41 pm
City and County of San Francisco West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:51 pm
City and County of San Francisco, California, a case the Supreme Court heard argument in earlier this week. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm
City and County of San Francisco, several of the justices seemed troubled by the Biden administration’s conduct and the prospect that the states may be left without any options in their effort to defend the rule’s legality. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 5:13 pm
The states (led by California) and the local governments (the city and county of San Francisco and the county of Santa Clara, California) echo a common theme: Arizona and the other Republican-led states have no right to intervene because, as a practical matter, this case does not affect them. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1967), DHS contends that the protection of children is an essential societal value and thus the interests it serves through home visits are more worthy of the public's concern than are Mother's interests in the protection of the sanctity of her home. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 4:07 pm
City and County of San Francisco to decide whether states with an interest in the dispute should be allowed to intervene to defend a rule when the United States is no longer doing so. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 3:55 pm
City and County of San Francisco, the justices agreed to decide whether a group of states, led by Arizona, can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
(relisted after the Sept. 27, Oct. 8 and Oct. 15 conferences) Arizona v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
” Abdulla v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
-Main 2.00 $96,321 $48,200 Univ. of Missouri-Kansas City 2.02 $99,005 $49,000 Indiana Univ. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Workers and their union and community allies have demonstrated for a minimum of $15 per hour, more than double the federal law, and they have done so successfully in a number of jurisdictions, both in cities and states like Seattle, Mountain View, San Francisco, and on a staggered basis, even California which possesses the fifth-largest economy in the world! [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
City of San Diego, S238563. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
As the Maine law explains, under a Ranked-Choice voting regime (a version of which has been used in some local jurisdictions, such as San Francisco County, for years), “the method of casting and tabulating votes [is one] in which voters rank candidates in order of preference, [and then] tabulation proceeds in sequential rounds in which last-place candidates are defeated and the candidate with the most votes in the final round is elected. [read post]