Search for: "Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 41 - 60
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
-Main 2.00 $96,321 $48,200 Univ. of Missouri-Kansas City 2.02 $99,005 $49,000 Indiana Univ. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Workers and their union and community allies have demonstrated for a minimum of $15 per hour, more than double the federal law, and they have done so successfully in a number of jurisdictions, both in cities and states like Seattle, Mountain View, San Francisco, and on a staggered basis, even California which possesses the fifth-largest economy in the world! [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
City of San Diego, S238563. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
As the Maine law explains, under a Ranked-Choice voting regime (a version of which has been used in some local jurisdictions, such as San Francisco County, for years), “the method of casting and tabulating votes [is one] in which voters rank candidates in order of preference, [and then] tabulation proceeds in sequential rounds in which last-place candidates are defeated and the candidate with the most votes in the final round is elected. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 8:30 am
This is the reason for the racial profiling lawsuits filed in New York City, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Maricopa County, Arizona. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:54 pm
Paul Elias of the AP reports that with nearly 26,500 reported auto burglaries, San Francisco has become the city with the most "smash-and-grabs" per capita of any major city in the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:00 am
AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY New York, Los Angeles, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, Ventura, Lancaster, Palmdale, Santa Barbara, Chicago, Washington D. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
City and County of San Francisco, 14-704, this week’s relist champion, earned its Jackson 5(th) relist. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
First up, County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704 Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia’s invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Then there’s three-time relist County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Meanwhile, County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
” County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
” At Cities Speak, Lisa Soronen discusses last week’s cert. grant in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
”Ibid.Soon after Amendment 2 was adopted, this litigation to declare its invalidity and enjoin its enforcement was commenced in the District Court for the City and County of Denver. [read post]
