Search for: "Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 41 - 60
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2018, 8:30 am
This is the reason for the racial profiling lawsuits filed in New York City, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Maricopa County, Arizona. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
In some cities (like San Francisco), the moniker signifies that local police officers are prevented not only from using city resources to comply with a detainer request from federal immigration officers (ICE), but also, critically, from gathering certain kinds of information or complying with ICE's requests for advance notification of when an individual (who is not a suspected violent felon) in city custody is being released. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:54 pm
Paul Elias of the AP reports that with nearly 26,500 reported auto burglaries, San Francisco has become the city with the most "smash-and-grabs" per capita of any major city in the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:00 am
AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY New York, Los Angeles, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, Ventura, Lancaster, Palmdale, Santa Barbara, Chicago, Washington D. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
City and County of San Francisco, 14-704, this week’s relist champion, earned its Jackson 5(th) relist. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
First up, County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704 Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia’s invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Then there’s three-time relist County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Meanwhile, County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
” County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
” At Cities Speak, Lisa Soronen discusses last week’s cert. grant in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
”Ibid.Soon after Amendment 2 was adopted, this litigation to declare its invalidity and enjoin its enforcement was commenced in the District Court for the City and County of Denver. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
That alternative is backed by a diverse group that includes The Bay Institute, the Contra Costa Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Environmental Entrepreneurs, the Planning and Conservation League, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the San Diego County Water Authority, Alameda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Otay Water District, the City of San Diego and the San Francisco… [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
In December 2010 she decided to relocate to San Francisco for family reasons. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Both Connerly and ACRI were permitted by the district court to intervene in the present case and were represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation, a conservative/libertarian public interest litigation firm that has successfully represented proponents of Section 31 in other cases, including Coral Constr, Inc v City & County of San Francisco (CalSCt (2010); 93 EPD ¶43,961) and Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc v City of San Jose… [read post]
