Search for: "Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 61 - 78
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In Lockyer v City & County of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court explained that the regulation of marriage in California is committed to state officials, so that the mayor of San Francisco had no authority to “take any action with regard to the process of issuing marriage licenses or registering marriage certificates. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
City and County of San Francisco, 95 P.3d 459, 472–73 (Cal. 2004). [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:07 am
And so did the city-county of San Francisco in its own brief in opposition, also filed Friday night. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:47 pm
The city and county of San Francisco, California's governor and its attorney general all opposed a stay. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
Cal.), with respect to the Omega Chemical Superfund Site, located in Whittier, Los Angeles County, California (the “Site”). [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Click Here Fulfilling sewer pact to cost city $3.5 billion. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 3:55 pm
County of San Francisco, Triple S. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
“It’s one of the most important threats to water quality right now,” said Miyoko Sakashita, a senior attorney at the group’s San Francisco office. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
An agreement between the company and the EPA was filed Monday in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
But negotiators say they hope to at least plot a course toward a new agreement that could be signed at next year’s climate conference in Mexico City. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:55 am
The other suits, filed by the leading LGBT public interest law firms and the ACLU, and by three governmental entities (cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles, and Santa Clara County), represent several couples who planned to marry in California and now would be barred from doing so, and the government entities, who would be precluded by Prop 8 from honoring the right to equal protection of the laws of their gay residents. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Arizona Life Coalition, et al. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
Box 4133 Tuba City, AZ 86045 Phone: (520) 283-6261 (V/TTY); (888) 848-1449 (Toll Free) Fax: (520) 283-6284 E-mail: assist01@frontiernet.net IHD Assistive Technology Center Institute for Human Development Northern Arizona University Box 5630 Flagstaff, AZ 86011 Phone: (928) 523-5878; (800) 553-0714 (Toll Free) TTY: (928) 523-1695 Fax: (928) 523-9127 E-mail: Lawerence.Gallagher@nau.edu Technology Access Center of Tucson, Inc. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Harris County Bail Bond Bd., No. 05-20714 A decision finding that a Texas statute restricting solicitation of potential customers denied bail bondsmen their First Amendment rights is affirmed in part and reversed in part where all but one of the restrictions violated the bondsmen's right to commercial speech. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
The San Diego County Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl Poinsettia BowlQualcomm Stadium, San Diego, California - Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:00 p.m. [read post]
