Search for: "Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2012, 10:03 am by David Snyder
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court released its unanimous opinion in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:37 pm by Rick E. Rayl
  Moreover, just as in the first takings decision from this term, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:21 am by Rick E. Rayl
  Following the decisions in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:29 pm by Patricia Salkin
Judge Braden’s decision relied heavily on a 2012 Supreme Court case, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:55 am by admin
WILLIAMS, TARA S.  11-597 ARKANSAS GAME & FISH COMMISSION v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 9:58 am by Anthony B. Cavender
However, the plaintiffs argued that the United States Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm by Rick E. Rayl
  If the Court does rule in favor of the government and, depending on one's view, either (a) significantly narrow the scope of Nollan and Dolan or (b) refuse to extend those decisions to another, similar context, this would appear contrary to the Court's recent decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:41 pm by Ilya Somin
In its unanimous decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am by Rick E. Rayl
"That temporarily taking someone’s property might qualify as a taking":  This refers to Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
6 Dec 2012, 7:12 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit decision finding that temporary flooding of property instituted by the government could not be a taking and remanded the matter for further findings.In Arkansas Fish and Game Commission v United States (11-597), the Court reversed the Circuit's conclusion that there can only be a taking if the flooding were permanent or inevitably reoccurring. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
As we also note in the brief, similar overreaching has already occurred in such cases as Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
6 Dec 2012, 7:01 am by Cormac Early
(h/t Howard Bashman) Michael Ramsey of The Originalism Blog comments on Tuesday’s decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Marissa Miller
At Cato @ Liberty, Ilya Shapiro discusses a cert. amicus brief filed by the Cato Institute in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 7:51 pm by Ilya Somin
I described the key issues at stake in this 2017 post: In its unanimous decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Department of Agriculture 14-275Issue: (1) Whether the government's “categorical duty” under the Fifth Amendment to pay just compensation when it “physically takes possession of an interest in property,” Arkansas Game & Fish Comm'n v. [read post]