Search for: "Arkansas v. Mississippi" Results 201 - 220 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am by Derek T. Muller
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. … [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:16 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
Missouri urges the Supreme Court to grant cert and consider the Down syndrome provision alongside the Mississippi law being contested in Dobbs. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Complete Auto Remains the Rule, As Modified by Wayfair The South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Michigan Ave., Suite 240Chicago, IL 60601Voice Phone (312)886-2359FAX (312)886-1807TDD (312)353-5693Region VI - Dallas (Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas)Ralph Rouse, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:20 am by Bennett Capers
" The NY Times story goes on to discuss a new study by the Equal Justice Initiative which examined race in jury selection in eight Southern states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Tennessee. [read post]
The states of Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming filed suit in the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:30 pm by Aurora Barnes
Mississippi when it requires a defendant to meet traditional tests of reliability under rules of evidence for using hearsay as substantive evidence. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:22 am by Jonathan H. Adler
First and foremost, it is notable than only six of the states that joined yesterday's amicus brief (Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Utah) were willing to join today's motion to intervene and join the Texas Bill of Complaint. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Bill Raftery
However, that effort was struck down by Federal courts only a day or two after the election (Awad v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]