Search for: "Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000)" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000), notwithstanding AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:00 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83 and Pearson Dental Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 3:00 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, any agreement to arbitrate will be deemed substantively unconscionable unless the agreement has mutuality (meaning it also requires the employer to arbitrate any claims it would likely want to bring against its employees) and it complies with five procedural requirements, including a neutral arbitrator, adequate discovery, a written award, all of the types of relief that would… [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83; and  Any requirement in the AAA rules that the plaintiff to pay one half of the arbitration fees should be severed and would not be cause to invalidate the arbitration clause.   [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:31 am by Steven G. Pearl
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, the Court of Appeal affirmed, holding that the acknowledgment was procedurally and substantively unconscionable.   [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:00 am by Steven B. Katz
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000) (declining to enforce employment-related arbitration agreement that did not contain specific procedural safeguards) are pending at various levels of the state and federal courts. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:36 am by Steven G. Pearl
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 106-107 (Armendariz).) [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:00 am by Walsh & Walsh, P.C.
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83 (Armendariz) apply to this statutory wage claim, a Berman hearing is not a prerequisite to arbitration, either under Armendariz or Gentry v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:54 am by Steven G. Pearl
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 114, the Court found that the agreement was procedurally unconscionable as a contract of adhesion, implemented on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:25 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 99-100, 103.) [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm by H. Scott Leviant
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 100 (Armendariz).)Slip op., at 34. [read post]