Search for: "Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000)"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2017, 12:25 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 99-100, 103.) [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 100 (Armendariz).)Slip op., at 34. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 3:05 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal. 4th 83 (2000). [read post]
Another day, another arbitration decision; employee handbook arbitration clause found to be illusory
3 Aug 2012, 3:48 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 105-106.) [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:54 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000)). [read post]
23 May 2008, 4:14 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000) [certain additional “badges of fairness” for arbitration clauses required in employment situations].) [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:40 am
The California Supreme Court, in its Armendariz v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:08 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, it was required to conduct judicial review sufficient to protect plaintiff’s unwaivable statutory rights arising from his FEHA claims. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 1:25 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000). [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:43 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83) when drafting the agreement, rather than attempting to give itself some advantages, the arbitration clause may have been saved. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:18 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, the court found that four clauses in the arbitration provision were unconscionable, including clauses permitting an appeal only from an award exceeding $100,000 or that included injunctive relief, requiring the appealing party to pay appeal costs subject to an apportionment of those costs by the arbitrators, and exempting repossession from arbitration while requiring that requests… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:12 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:47 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 114-121 (Armendariz).) [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:32 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal. 4th 83 (2000). [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:09 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., No. [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:15 am
Armendariz. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:31 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Serv., 24 Cal.4th 83, 113 2000). [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 8:35 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, 24 Cal.4th at 118, 99 (2000). [read post]
