Search for: "Armour v. Indianapolis"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am
The second case is Armour v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:00 am
I think the answer is no, but he joined a dissenting opinion, written by Chief Justice Roberts, in Armour v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 2:09 pm
Vance v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:43 am
On June 4, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Armour v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:43 am
On June 4, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Armour v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm
Howards and Justice Breyer giving the summary for the opinion in Armour v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:01 am
Posted by Kelvin LawrenceIn a 6-3 opinion penned by Justice Breyer, the United States Supreme Court ruled on June 4 that the City of Indianapolis did not violate the 14th Amendment's guarantee of Equal Protection by denying refunds to taxpayers who paid a special sewer assessment in a lump sum, while discharging the future obligations of taxpayers who would have paid the assessment by installments. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am
” And in the same paper’s Opinionator blog, Linda Greenhouse parses the tea leaves from last week’s decision in Armour v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:01 am
” At the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein argues that the Court’s recent decision in Armour v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:01 am
As Paul Larkin pointed out in Armour v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:01 am
Here's more on Armour v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:44 am
In Armour v, City of Indianapolis the Supreme Court ruled that equal protection was not violated by the city's decision to treat these taxpayers unequally. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
In Armour v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:34 am
Sewer improvements No equal protection claim Those who paid full fee Opinion: pdf html [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
In a 6-3 ruling in Armour v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm
That's the essence of today's opinion in Armour v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Unless the state’s promise of equality actually also embraced a refund for those worse off, the differing outcomes for the taxpayers are not unconstitutional, the Court declared by a 6-3 vote in Armour, et al., v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:20 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Monday ruled 6-3 [opinion, PDF] in Armour v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 10:53 am
The Court's answer in its brief opinion in Amour v.... [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Justice Breyer announced the first opinion, in Armour v. [read post]
