Search for: "Armour v. Indianapolis" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2016, 9:00 am
I think the answer is no, but he joined a dissenting opinion, written by Chief Justice Roberts, in Armour v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
Howards and Justice Breyer giving the summary for the opinion in Armour v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
And in the same paper’s Opinionator blog, Linda Greenhouse parses the tea leaves from last week’s decision in Armour v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:01 am by Conor McEvily
At the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein argues that the Court’s recent decision in Armour v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:44 am by Calvin Massey
In Armour v, City of Indianapolis the Supreme Court ruled that equal protection was not violated by the city's decision to treat these taxpayers unequally.  [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:34 am by SupremeCourtHaiku
Sewer improvements No equal protection claim Those who paid full fee Opinion:  pdf   html [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Lyle Denniston
Unless the state’s promise of equality actually also embraced a refund for those worse off, the differing outcomes for the taxpayers are not unconstitutional, the Court declared by a 6-3 vote in Armour, et al., v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:20 am by Rebecca DiLeonardo
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Monday ruled 6-3 [opinion, PDF] in Armour v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:14 am by Kali Borkoski
Justice Breyer announced the first opinion, in Armour v. [read post]