Search for: "Armour v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2008, 9:00 pm
On Friday 14 November, Mr Justice Arnold delivered his judgment in Armour Group Plc v Leisuretech Electronics Pty Ltd [2008] EWHC 2797 (now available from BAILII here). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:12 am by lpbncontracts
In an opinion unsealed on January 10, 2011, the Court of Federal Claims rejected Armour of America's breach of contract claims and granted judgement to the United States on its counterclaims in Armour of America v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:38 pm
Back in February of 2014, German sportswear giant Adidas filed a patent infringement suit against competitor Under Armour, Inc. in United States District Court for the District of Delaware.Adidas accused Under Armour and its newly acquired fitness tracker subsidiary, MapMyFitness, Inc., of infringing ten of its patents. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:01 am by Kelvin Lawrence
  The majority's opinion was careful to reiterate that administrative considerations cannot justify tax distinctions in all circumstances, and suggested a strong reliance on the text of the state statute at issue. [read post]
8 May 2017, 11:52 am
WilnerHolding:  An award of losses in the amount of the value of time spent by principals and employees in performing litigation-related activities was proper, given an expense-shifting provision negotiated separately by sophisticated parties calling expressly for reimbursement in the event of losses.Facts:  Appellant Under Armour, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
Howards and Justice Breyer giving the summary for the opinion in Armour v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:38 pm
 At issue in the case is whether Hardwire properly stated a claim under the RICO statute at 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 5:57 pm by D. Daniel Sokol
Volume 2009, no. 6Articles“Law and Finance”: Inaccurate, Incomplete, and ImportantRuth V. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 11:35 pm by Sme
Universal Protection Services (10th Cir., February 16, 2018) (affirming dismissal or Armour's discrimination suit for failure to state a claim: her complaint contained only speculation that Universal's conduct had discriminatory or retaliatory motive)*Nunez v. [read post]