Search for: "Armstrong v. Armstrong" Results 41 - 60 of 996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 24 April 2023, Linden J granted an injunction following the hack of the claimant’s IT system in the case of Armstrong Watson LLP v Persons Unknown [2023] EWHC 921 (KB). [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
The article responds to the recent decision of Abbasi & ors v Newcastle NHS Trust & ors. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by William C. MacLeod and Darby Hobbs
  Some called for Congress to restore the FTC’s authority to seek monetary remedies for deceptive practices under 13(b), which the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am by CMS
As a matter of English law, if a state, as principal, represents that a person had authority to act on its behalf, it will be bound by the acts of that person with respect to anyone dealing with him as an agent on the faith of that representation (Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva (AD) [1953] A.C. 461). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On the same day Ritchie J handed down judgment in the case of Armstrong Watson LLP v Persons Unknown [2023] EWHC 762 (KB) setting out his reasons for granting a without notice injunction at a private hearing in a case where the claimant law firm had been subject to a hack of its IT systems and a subsequent blackmail attempt. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 8:48 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:33 am by Alexandra L. Arko
Thus, based on the scan of real images, an AI program could be asked to generate an image of Neil Armstrong walking with Orville Wright in downtown Cleveland. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:33 am by Alexandra L. Arko
Thus, based on the scan of real images, an AI program could be asked to generate an image of Neil Armstrong walking with Orville Wright in downtown Cleveland. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am by Guest Author
”   In other words, Pennsylvania Coal demonstrates why it is so important for courts to keep in mind the principle the Supreme Court articulated in Armstrong v. [read post]