Search for: "Armstrong v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 352
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
United States, 220 F. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 8:30 am
Canby Jr. of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, a founding faculty member of the College of Law. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 7:39 am
In its Reasoned Decision, USADA cited one Court of Arbitration for Sport decision, one United States Court of Appeals, Eight Circuit decision, and one American Arbitration Association decision in support of its claim that the statute of limitations was suspended because Mr. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 2:29 pm
In the United States, that standard is typically “clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:00 am
On October 10, 2012, the United States Anti-doping Agency (“USADA”) issued a 202-page reasoned decision describing evidence against Lance Armstrong and alleged rule violations (the “Reasoned Decision”). [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:52 pm
United States, No. 11-597 (cert. granted Apr. 2, 2012). [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 6:57 am
See Cathedral Hill Tower v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:01 am
Attorney in the case of United States v Samuel Mullet, et al, charged members of a peculiar Amish synod with hate crimes; charges that involve far more complex proofs.About two-years ago, ole Samuel Mullet [you cannot make it up] broke away from the traditional fundamentalist Christian Amish church in which he was raised, to start a renegade sect of his own in Bergholz, Ohio. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 9:33 pm
by Jeremy Clare Even though Lance Armstrong decided on August 23rd not to proceed to arbitration with the United States Anti-Doping Agency (“USADA”), the process for sanctioning Mr. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Wallishauser v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:54 pm
Tygart and the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) dismissing his complaint alleging due process [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:20 pm
Related Posts: Armstrong v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:56 pm
United States Anti-Doping Agency, No. 12-0606 (W.D. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:14 am
Our blogs have been following the Lance Armstrong v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:47 am
The USADA then announced that three members of Armstrong’s team received lifetime periods of ineligibility as the result of their anti-doping rule violations in the United States Postal Service (USPS) Cycling Team Doping Conspiracy. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:44 am
Soon after, the USADA announced that three members of Armstrong’s team have all received lifetime periods of ineligibility as the result of their anti-doping rule violations in the United States Postal Service (USPS) Cycling Team Doping Conspiracy. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:42 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:40 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:18 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has deepened this injustice. [read post]
