Search for: "Armstrong v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 328
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2013, 5:06 am by David Markus
United States, raised the issue of whether the feds could charge a woman who poisoned her husband under the country's treaty power. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:55 am by Beth Graham
In related news, Armstrong’s former team director, Johan Bruyneel, and two former United States Postal Service cycling team doctors, Pedro Celaya and Jose Marti, will apparently face arbitration before the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) in December. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:06 pm by Jon Gelman
Since then, narcotic painkillers, or opioids, have become the most frequently prescribed drugs in the United States and have set off a wave of misuse, abuse and addiction. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
United States Parole Commission v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:12 am
This vignette takes place after the oral argument in the Watergate tapes case (United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:50 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Department of Justice (DOJ) announced today that it will intervene in the qui tam False Claims Act suit filed by relator Floyd Landis against Lance Armstrong and others: United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 8:30 am by azatty
Canby Jr. of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, a founding faculty member of the College of Law. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 7:39 am by Victoria VanBuren
In its Reasoned Decision, USADA cited one Court of Arbitration for Sport decision, one United States Court of Appeals, Eight Circuit decision, and one American Arbitration Association decision in support of its claim that the statute of limitations was suspended because Mr. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 2:29 pm by Victoria VanBuren
In the United States, that standard is typically “clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
  On October 10, 2012, the United States Anti-doping Agency (“USADA”)  issued a 202-page reasoned decision describing evidence against Lance Armstrong and alleged rule violations (the “Reasoned Decision”). [read post]