Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold" Results 221 - 240 of 1,930
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2015, 8:32 am
Incidentally, the 81,423-wordjudgment does not contain the W word ...There has just fallen onto the desk of this Kat the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold at first instance following the full trial in the long-running case of Mylan and Actavis v Warner-Lambert. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:06 pm
Earlier today this Kat posted this note on Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch), the latest in a line of important trade mark rulings from Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:31 am
This Kat posted last month on the fascinating case of Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat), in which Arnold J gave the first detailed UK consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm by L. Gopika
 Justice Arnold, also relied on case law such as 20C Fox v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:20 pm by Michael Haggerson
[JURIST] The California Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF; Perry v. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:21 pm by Patent Docs
Dennis Crouch of the University of Missouri, Deborah Fishman of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, and Jennifer Johnson of DuPont will explore the ramifications of the April decision Helsinn v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 11:19 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Board Certified Family Law Specialist Matt Arnold answers the question: “What is an Absolute Divorce? [read post]
2 May 2018, 11:19 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Board Certified Family Law Specialist Matt Arnold answers the question: “What is an Absolute Divorce? [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 3:41 pm
 This blogpost reported the Patents Court ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat). [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:27 am by Jani Ihalainen
This writer, in shame, will admit he has not gotten around to discussing the case as promptly as he wanted, but decided it was high-time to address this case in more detail.The case in question is Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC v WPMC Ltd, which dealt with the Beatles' first concert on US soil, performed at the (now defunct) Washington DC Coliseum in February 1964. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:00 am by Walsh & Walsh, P.C.
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has vetoed SB 1370, which was enacted in response to a 1999 federal court ruling (Lett v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
* Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic (but not distinctive) London black cabMr Justice Arnold addresses the issue of whether the iconic London cab can be a trade mark in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as the London Taxi Company v (1) Frazer-Nash Research Limited and (2) Ecotive Limited [2016] EWHC 52 (Ch). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:11 am by Brian Shiffrin
The Court of Appeals has repeatedly held that a prospective juror with actual bias, such as an opinion that the defendant is guilty, is qualified to serve on a jury as long as gives an unequivocal assurance she can be fair and impartial (People v Nicholas, 98 NY2d 749, 751 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600, 614 [2000]). [read post]