Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2014, 4:36 am
., Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited, [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), 22 May 2009. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:32 am
Incidentally, the 81,423-wordjudgment does not contain the W word ...There has just fallen onto the desk of this Kat the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold at first instance following the full trial in the long-running case of Mylan and Actavis v Warner-Lambert. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 6:15 am
ARNOLD and GERALDINE N. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:31 am
This Kat posted last month on the fascinating case of Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat), in which Arnold J gave the first detailed UK consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:06 pm
Earlier today this Kat posted this note on Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch), the latest in a line of important trade mark rulings from Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm
Justice Arnold, also relied on case law such as 20C Fox v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 11:19 am
Board Certified Family Law Specialist Matt Arnold answers the question: “What is an Absolute Divorce? [read post]
2 May 2018, 11:19 am
Board Certified Family Law Specialist Matt Arnold answers the question: “What is an Absolute Divorce? [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 3:41 pm
This blogpost reported the Patents Court ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat). [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 3:53 pm
” Sigg v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:36 am
Lucent Technologies v. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:21 pm
Dennis Crouch of the University of Missouri, Deborah Fishman of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, and Jennifer Johnson of DuPont will explore the ramifications of the April decision Helsinn v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:20 pm
[JURIST] The California Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF; Perry v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:15 am
In Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court denied review in Wood v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:27 am
This writer, in shame, will admit he has not gotten around to discussing the case as promptly as he wanted, but decided it was high-time to address this case in more detail.The case in question is Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC v WPMC Ltd, which dealt with the Beatles' first concert on US soil, performed at the (now defunct) Washington DC Coliseum in February 1964. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has vetoed SB 1370, which was enacted in response to a 1999 federal court ruling (Lett v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
* Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic (but not distinctive) London black cabMr Justice Arnold addresses the issue of whether the iconic London cab can be a trade mark in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as the London Taxi Company v (1) Frazer-Nash Research Limited and (2) Ecotive Limited [2016] EWHC 52 (Ch). [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
Arnold, 2008 U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 12:56 am
The IPKat has recently spotted Target Fixings Ltd v Brutt Beteiligungsgesellschaft and others, a UK trade marks decision of Appointed Person Richard Arnold QC, Case O-372-06 from 20 December 2006. [read post]
