Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold" Results 161 - 180 of 1,934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am by Brian Cordery
At first instance, Arnold J followed two first instance English Court decisions which suggest that the transfer of equitable title is sufficient (KCI v Smith & Nephew [2010] and HTC v Gemalto [2013]). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:55 am
  Counsel for Pfizer drew analogy between this situation and “the situation where an injunction is sought pending appeal even though the patent has been held invalid at first instance, as to which see Novartis AG v Hospira UK Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 583, [2014] 1 WLR 1264. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 1:42 pm by Daily Record Staff
Environmental law — Voluntary Cleanup Program — Private cause of action Appellants Ruth Sherrill, Sherry Moore-Edmonds, Elizabeth Arnold, Merab Rice, Tim Bull, and Julia Dinkins (collectively, “Appellants”) filed suit in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City seeking a declaratory judgment, mandamus, and a permanent injunction against any construction activities on several lots of waterfront property ... [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:05 am by Daily Record Staff
Driscoll, III, Jana Gantt, Arnold Hillman, Kimberly Lane, and Deena Reynolds (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Driscoll”), appellees, against mortgagor Harriette Elizabeth ... [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:03 am
Interesting (albeit irritating) liquor law decision out of the Second Circuit: Arnold's Wines Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:29 am
Emilio Pucci appealed.Richard Arnold QC dismissed the appeal. [read post]
5 May 2015, 11:41 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “What exactly is a wrongful death claim? [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:04 am by sally
“Piercing the corporate veil is currently a hot topic with a difference of opinion between various judges on several of the finer points, especially in a contractual context (compare Burton J in Gramsci v Stepanovs [2011] EWCH 333 Comm with Arnold J in VTB v Nutritek [2011] EWCH 3107 CH). [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:31 pm
In substance, Arnold J said no [the IPKat says, this is consonant with the position recently taken by the General Court with regard to appeals against successful rulings in invalidity proceedings in Case T-300/08 Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Tresplain Investments Ltd]. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 12:16 pm
They can search your laptop at the border without probable cause. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:20 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 902 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a majority of 4-1 in the case concerning the true interpretation of 5 versions of a clause which has been described as a service charge clause in the long lease agreement of 25 chalets in the respondent’s leisure park. [read post]