Search for: "Arnold v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,501
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
On 11 March 2020 the Court of Appeal (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) will hand down judgment in the data protection case of Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, (heard 29 and 30 January 2020). [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am
TheInfluence of Member State Submissions on Copyright Law” (forthcoming Modern LawReview)]This paper presented a really fascinating look at the "explosion" of copyright jurisprudence at the CJEU. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm
” Alito says, in reference to a statute that President Barack Obama’s administration declined to defend in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
The tabloid accused Headley of being a “cosmetic cowboy”, falsely stating that she had botched the treatment of customers. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
When it comes to the validity of European patents, the national courts of the EPC member states apply the same law as the EPO. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
Switzerland Swiss local reports that the Swiss Federal Court has held that clicking “like” on Facebook on hateful content could amount to a crime United States The US has recently tightened regulations over Chinese state media. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 Nov [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 4 to 7 February 2020 Warby J heard the trial in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm
See Gullickson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:33 am
Just like in an October 2019 early first hearing in another Nokia v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:54 am
" (Bonz Group (Pty) Ltd v Cooke [1994] 3 N.Z.L.R. 216). [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:31 am
It just a few months ago that this blog reported on the Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev in the Sky v SkyKick, C-371/18 case.important A referral from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales made by Arnold J (as he then was), the Sky case is probably the most important referral in the EU trade mark field made over the past few years. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 5:05 pm
In Cash America [v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Arnold H. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
And a case involving foreign official immunity that requires a [Disclosure: Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:25 am
In light of this, (and further to the 18 points on the state of communication to the public set out by Arnold J in Paramount v BSkyB at 12) Mr Justice Birss thus sewed summised the following 8 factors from the rich tapestry of the communication to the public case law:Assessment of communication to the public is an individualised and case specific assessment which must be carried out as a whole.Providing a link to a work is capable of being an act of communication to the… [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:24 am
Further, as Arnold J set out in EMI Records v British Sky Broadcasting [2013] EWHC 379 (Ch) proportionality and fair balance with fundamental rights must also be taken into account.The claimants sought an injunction to restrain the defendant from infringing their copyright, but without defining their repertoire.Birss aligned this case with those cases brought by collecting societies such as PPL and PRS against defendants such as retailers and public house owners who do not have a… [read post]
