Search for: "Arnold v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
The leading case in the UK post pregabalin is Eli Lilly v Genentech [2019] EWHC 387, where Arnold J also found that the plausibility threshold was not met.The key take home message is that plausibility is alive and well in the UK. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:00 pm
Mr Justice Arnold agreed, stating that this was the reasoning he gave for not following the rule for costs orders. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
Arnold J concluded his judgment by stating that he would have awarded a higher figure of damages to the Claimants had it not been for these social media postings. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:59 pm
Bently's argument that the focus in eBay v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:26 am
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, famous in patent circles for his antisuit injunction and FRAND determination in the Microsoft v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 10:30 am
Unfortunately, German patent judges very much take a property-centric approach to IPR enforcement as I stated a few days ago in connection with an Unwired Planet v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
Arnold H. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:16 am
On Lam v Arnold Montag Architect 2019 NY Slip Op 30712(U) March 13, 2019 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 522413/2017 Judge: Pamela L. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:02 pm
Sir Richard Arnold would like to see a mandatory list of copyright limitations. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:44 pm
Benisek and Rucho v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:16 am
Come on CJEU, give us a decision which leads to a valid SPC....The AmeriKat is whiskers deep in papers at the moment, but she took a few minutes just now to have a look at this morning's latest SPC decision from the Court of Justice of the European Union in C-443/17 Abraxis v Comptroller General of Patents, which was subject to a referral made by Mr Justice Arnold on 16 March 2017 (see previous IPKat posts here). [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:47 am
Notably, Mr Justice Arnold considered the principles of insufficiency established by Warner-Lambert v Actavis applicable, even though the use of the antibody to treat psoriasis was a first medical use. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:46 am
Facts: This case (Sherwood v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:19 am
” United States v Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 755 (1987). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
In two recent decisions (“Unwired Planet” and “Conversant”) (Unwired Planet v Huawei [2018] EWCA Civ 2344, IPKat post here; Huawei v Conversant [2019] EWCA Civ 38, IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal has endorsed this practice.Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
