Search for: "Arnold v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 1,491
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2023, 5:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(That action, Peter Arnold et al. v 4-6 Bleecker Street LLC et al., has the NYSCEF Index no. 158541/2013.) [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm by Eleonora Rosati
I would add that the same is true of the relevance of the creative process, especially if this was intended as an intention to create something 'artistic': the author’s state of mind, intention, sanity or lack thereof count and should count 0. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:02 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Indeed, easyGroup lost a trade mark dispute against EasyRoommate where Arnold J (as he then was) found that the trade mark was descriptive and therefore invalid. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by Gianna Hill
In a recent report, Viral V. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 10:16 am by Giles Peaker
Reading Borough Council v Holland (2023) EWHC 1902 (Ch) An appeal of a possession order made at first instance for Ms Holland’s introductory tenancy of sheltered accommodation. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am by Alessandro Cerri
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am by Rose Hughes
Accordingly, as recently summarised by Lord Justice Arnold, the three key considerations for claim interpretation in the UK are 1) the wording of the claim, 2) the context provided by the specification and 3) the inventor’s purpose (InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWCA Civ 105). [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
Lord Justice Richard Arnold through Eleanor Wilson, who only lacks an ‘o’ and the final letter ‘a’ in common with the esteemed Professor Eleonora Rosati, but who makes up for this nominal deficiency by her enthusiasm for swing dancing and cocktails. [read post]