Search for: "Arnold v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 1,443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
The end result of that litigation was that both parties agreed there was a contract between them and that it was governed by the law of the state of Pennsylvania (where it had been litigated). [read post]
26 May 2021, 8:40 pm by Adeline Chong
A distinctive feature of Singapore law on issue estoppel is the rejection of the broadly worded “special circumstances” exception to issue in English common law (Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93). [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Arnold is a Senior Director – Legal at the University of Texas/Texas A&M Investment Management Company (UTIMCO). [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am by Ben Millson (Bristows)
Turning to de minimis, Arnold LJ noted that it was common ground that his own statement of the law in Napp v Dr Reddy’s [2016] EWHC 1517 (Pat) was accurate, and analysed whether three “groups” of infringement were de minimis. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am by Nicolas Round (Bristows)
The judge began with a broad definition: Stated generally the law is clear that patents are directed to those likely to have a real and practical interest in the subject matter of the invention[2]. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Reich, written by Judge Morris Arnold and joined by Judge Steven Colloton, considered "whether [Missouri state representative Cheri Toalson] Reisch acted under color of state law when she blocked [Mike] Campbell on Twitter. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 2:25 am by Hannah McAslan (UK) and Patty Tan
Since posting this update, we understand that there have been further developments in several EU27 Member States as to the temporary transitional measures that are available, and we have updated our summary table to reflect these developments. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
[Disclosure: My law firm, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, is among the counsel to the respondent in the Baltimore case. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
 Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am by Nedim Malovic
In this sense, the CJEU reasoned that paragraph 1 in that provision must be interpreted as allowing a court of a Member State to apply a convention concluded between a Member State of the EU and a non-member State before 1 January 1958 or, for States acceding to the EU, before the date of their accession, such as the Convention between Switzerland and Germany concerning the Reciprocal Protection of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, signed in Berlin on 13 April… [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm by Riana Harvey
Lord Justice Arnold - ‘Website-blocking injunctions and streaming server-blocking injunctions: the state of the art’The event’s keynote speaker Lord Justice Arnold kicked things off with an overview of the different types of liability in the UK, looking also at the legislative basis for intermediary liability in the EU and the UK. [read post]