Search for: "Arnold v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 1,494
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2021, 10:58 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: My law firm, Arnold & Porter, is among the counsel to the NAACP in this case.] [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 11:09 pm by Florian Mueller
I'm sure they just couldn't do anything about Judge Kuehnen, who based on how that (mis)judgment reads was just hell-bent to enjoin and may have known SWM's lead counsel too well as a result of certain seminars they co-organized.The Arnold Ruess firm made Quinn Emanuel almost look like fools when Arnold Ruess represented Nokia and Quinn was defending Daimler. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 8:43 am by Rachel Casper
Avana Epperson-Temple, a litigation attorney at the Boston-based law firm Peabody & Arnold, discusses volunteerism and work-life balance in Episode 2: Pathways of the Women of Color: Legal Diaries, hosted by Massachusetts lawyer Naitasia V. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Hyun Woo Kang
The court is to construe the contract so as to give effect to the parties’ intention as disclosed by the language read in context (Arnold v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  Arnold LJ is the preeminent patent law specialist on the Court of Appeal. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  Arnold LJ is the preeminent patent law specialist on the Court of Appeal. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
At the outset of the hearing the Judge stated that his objection in the BMS case was directed to a paper application for the listing of the trial being made when the scope of the trial and in particular that there was another action to be joined to it, was not fully appreciated. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Mary Ziegler on the Texas, the Supreme Court and Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “In order to succeed on a claim for accounting malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate a departure from accepted standards of practice and that the departure was a proximate cause of injury (see KBL, LLP v Community Counseling & Mediation Servs., 123 AD3d 488 [2014]; Kristina Denise Enters., Inc. v Arnold, 41 AD3d 788 [2007]; D.D. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Circuit Judge Morris Arnold said. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Arnold Plant said the case for monopoly can’t be justified on the basis that the profits of monopoly will go to desireable things. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 11:40 pm by Léon Dijkman
Even in the US, where courts have exercised discretion over patent injunctions since the Supreme Court's 2006 decision in eBay v. [read post]