Search for: "Arnold v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2011, 1:22 pm by WIMS
The case involves the fact that from 1987 to 2001, Arnold Bengis, Jeffrey Noll and David Bengis (jointly, defendants) engaged in an elaborate scheme to illegally harvest large quantities of South Coast and West Coast rock lobsters in South African waters for export to the United States in violation of both South African and U.S. law. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:10 am by Oswin Ridderbusch
The referral, but unfortunately not the referred question, has now been answered by the CJEU with its order in Eli Lilly v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:02 pm by Guest Blogger
  As a result, the uncertainty regarding the Court’s jurisdiction could well persist and perhaps intensify, an unfortunate outcome for the parties, the Court, and the millions of low income families relying on the tax subsidies in order to afford health insurance.Rob Weiner, formerly Associate Deputy Attorney General in the United States Department of Justice, is a partner at Arnold & Porter LLP. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 6:51 am
Arnold, Judge.Representing Walters: R. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Homeland Security Investigations and US Attorneys' offices did just that in Operation Mummy's Curse, which involved the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:00 am by John Jascob
This list includes (among others) (i) publicly traded companies, (ii) 501(c) tax exempt entities under the Internal Revenue Code, (iii) certain pooled investment vehicles, (iv) any entity that (a) employs more than 20 employees on a full-time basis in the United States, (b) filed in the previous year's federal income tax returns more than $5,000,000 in gross receipts or sales in the aggregate (including the receipts or sales of other entities owned by the entity and other… [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 7:15 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Did you know that at any given moment, up to 2.3 million citizens are confined in our prisons in the United States?  [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 3:33 am by Florian Mueller
In the United States, Nokia won a preliminary ruling at the ITC over two patents, and the result could be a U.S. import ban against HTC's Android-based devices. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
 Be that as it may, here's Tim's take on what Arnold J's decision has achieved, how they go about dealing with the same phenomenon in the United States -- and where we might go from here:Richemont v BskyB and others: a national solution to a global problem? [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:36 am by Florian Mueller
Conversant, a privateer asserting patents against different industry players on Nokia's behalf, has suffered some significant setbacks lately in France (against LG) and the United States (against Apple). [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 11:07 am
On February 20, 2008, in an 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Preston v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:43 am by Rokia Hassanein
“President Trump spent more than a year on the campaign trail promising ‘a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States,’” the brief notes. [read post]