Search for: "Arnold v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2019, 2:10 am
The referral, but unfortunately not the referred question, has now been answered by the CJEU with its order in Eli Lilly v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Arnold. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:02 pm
As a result, the uncertainty regarding the Court’s jurisdiction could well persist and perhaps intensify, an unfortunate outcome for the parties, the Court, and the millions of low income families relying on the tax subsidies in order to afford health insurance.Rob Weiner, formerly Associate Deputy Attorney General in the United States Department of Justice, is a partner at Arnold & Porter LLP. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
”) State v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am
United States v Arnold, 117 F.3d 1308 (11th Cir. 1997). [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 7:33 am
United States, 405 U.S. 150, 153 (1972), United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 6:51 am
Arnold, Judge.Representing Walters: R. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
This list includes (among others) (i) publicly traded companies, (ii) 501(c) tax exempt entities under the Internal Revenue Code, (iii) certain pooled investment vehicles, (iv) any entity that (a) employs more than 20 employees on a full-time basis in the United States, (b) filed in the previous year's federal income tax returns more than $5,000,000 in gross receipts or sales in the aggregate (including the receipts or sales of other entities owned by the entity and other… [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm
Homeland Security Investigations and US Attorneys' offices did just that in Operation Mummy's Curse, which involved the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
Be that as it may, here's Tim's take on what Arnold J's decision has achieved, how they go about dealing with the same phenomenon in the United States -- and where we might go from here:Richemont v BskyB and others: a national solution to a global problem? [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 3:33 am
In the United States, Nokia won a preliminary ruling at the ITC over two patents, and the result could be a U.S. import ban against HTC's Android-based devices. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:50 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 11:07 am
On February 20, 2008, in an 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Preston v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
Arnold v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:36 am
Conversant, a privateer asserting patents against different industry players on Nokia's behalf, has suffered some significant setbacks lately in France (against LG) and the United States (against Apple). [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:00 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:45 am
The jury didn’t buy it, and Elonis was convicted after a trial in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
