Search for: "Arthur Bright" Results 1 - 20 of 169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 6:48 am by Kal Raustiala
As negotiations toward a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas stall yet again, a key question looms: who will govern Gaza “the day after” the fighting stops? [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 10:10 am by Gene Takagi
Tyler, Martha Jimenez, Lauren Bright, SSRN) One Thing Philanthropy Must Leave Behind—The Values of Extractive Capitalism (Will Cordery and Constance Paige-Young, Nonprofit Quarterly) Philanthropy’s Role in Reparations and Building a Culture of Racial Repair (Aria Florant, Tonyel Edwards, Cora Daniels, Alexandra (Alex) Williams, Maurice Asare, Vikas Maturi, Bridgespan Group) Guide to Election Year Activities of Section 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) Organizations (Steven H. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
As well, we are seeing a lot of what Toronto Star columnist Bruce Arthur brilliantly called “crayon law” — nonsense legalese drafted by people who have no clue about basic law. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:50 am by centerforartlaw
” Ming Wu, Conflux’s chief technology officer is optimistic for a bright metaverse future in which many more Chinese companies will integrate with permissionless blockchains. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Rebecca Files
These non-independent leaders are chosen more frequently when the CEO holds greater power in the organization or the firm employs a Big Five auditor (namely, KPMG, Deloitte and Touche, Pricewaterhouse Coopers, Ernst & Young, or Arthur Andersen). [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
  A word or phrase is vague when it has borderline cases: for example, the word "tall" is vague, because there is no bright line between those individuals who are tall and those who are not. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The 2011 statutory amendments clarified who will constitute a real party, and hence a necessary party, at the first stage of the process to provide a “bright line rule” regarding who must be named and served, but did not “alter the second step, i.e., evaluating whether the real party in interest was indispensable to the action” such that the action could not proceed in the party’s absence. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Shortly after becoming president, he was diagnosed with Bright’s disease, a kidney ailment now referred to as nephritis. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:02 pm by Amy Howe
The decision came in the case of Arthur Lange, a California man convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
  The law provides salutary “bright line” rules that govern this aspect of CEQA litigation and provide the certainty intended by the Legislature, i.e., the agency’s filing of a facially valid NOD is the statute of limitations trigger; the NOD provides constructive notice to the public and all potential litigants of the parties required to be sued; and potential plaintiffs have the responsibility to check the public record for and to review such notices, and any… [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:01 am
Behavioral Corporate Finance: The Life Cycle of a CEO Career Posted by Marius Guenzel (The Wharton School), and Ulrike Malmendier (University of California Berkeley), on Friday, December 4, 2020 Tags: Behavioral finance, Decision making, Management, Manager characteristics, Managerial style, Mergers & acquisitions Defining the Role of the Audit Committee in Overseeing ESG Posted by Kristen Sullivan, Maureen Bujno, and Leeann Galezio Arthur,… [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:48 pm by David Priess
In 1881, less than a year after ascending to the presidency following the assassination of James Garfield, Chester Arthur found out that he had Bright’s disease—a fatal kidney condition. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Conclusion and Implications While the Court of Appeal’s opinion correctly follows settled law, it is nonetheless important both as a reminder of the operation of CEQA’s “bright line” statute of limitations rules, and to clarify the very limited situations in which an NOD or NOE will be deemed “facially invalid” such that its filing will not trigger CEQA’s short statute of limitations periods. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a published opinion filed March 24, 2020, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Division One) reversed a judgment of dismissal with prejudice, entered by the San Diego County Superior Court after sustaining a demurrer without leave on statute of limitations grounds to a group’s action challenging the CEQA review for Caltrans’ Interstate 5 (I-5)/State Route 56 (SR 56) freeway interchange project (the “Project”). [read post]