Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 201 - 220
of 413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2015, 9:45 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 2:46 pm
Further, “[f]or many projects, a qualitative analysis of construction traffic may be appropriate. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 2:41 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 6:10 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
5 May 2015, 5:03 pm
I recall that Mike Zischke, co-author of CEB’s excellent CEQA treatise, used to be fond of saying the “normal” or “usual rules” for analyzing cumulative impacts should apply to analysis of a project’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under CEQA. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
In a 47-page published decision filed June 17, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment denying a writ petition, and held that Respondent Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (“Agency”) must comply with CEQA before “refining” its Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (“MSHCP”) to exclude a 200-acre parcel of ranch land owned by Anheuser-Busch, LLC (“Busch”) from its protections against… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
(Guidance on information that may be included in such an analysis is presented in Appendix F.) [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
In an opinion recently ordered published, the First District Court of Appeal extensively reviewed the relevant case law and expressed skepticism that CEQA would operate in reverse to require analysis of potential impacts on a mixed-use project’s construction workers and future residents from pre-existing soil contamination at the project site. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:38 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:26 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 11:55 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:35 pm
In a published decision filed May 28, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed that part of the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate and otherwise affirmed the judgment, thus upholding the City of San Diego’s Balboa Park revitalization project (“Project”) against various land use law and CEQA challenges. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:21 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:33 pm
In a published decision filed October 31, 2014 (Paulek v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:24 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:25 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
