Search for: "Arthur F. Coon" Results 201 - 220 of 405
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2016, 1:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion filed November 29, and belatedly ordered published on December 22, 2016, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s denial of a writ petition challenging on CEQA grounds the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s (Muni) approval of a light rail construction contract. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:36 am by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion filed December 7, and later ordered published on December 16, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment denying a writ petition on the “single legal issue” whether plaintiffs were entitled under Public Resources Code § 21151(c) (and a municipal code section with essentially the same content) to an appeal of a planning commission’s “substantial conformance review” (SCR) determination to the city council. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a lengthy published opinion filed November 29, 2016, the First District Court of Appeal rejected all legal challenges to the City of San Francisco’s Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) and related land use approvals for a 488,000-square-foot multipurpose event center project on 11 acres in the City’s Mission Bay South redevelopment plan area (the “Project”). [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Such impacts are traditionally measured – as was the case here – with the LOS A to F scale, where A is free flowing and F is congested “stop and go” traffic. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 5:02 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a 29-page published opinion filed October 14, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal dispensed some good news to municipalities desiring to reasonably regulate retail medical marijuana facilities within their jurisdictional boundaries. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a published opinion filed August 31, 2016, the Sixth Appellate District Court of Appeal rejected claims under CEQA and the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (“SMARA”; Pub. [read post]