Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 221 - 240
of 448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
(Guidance on information that may be included in such an analysis is presented in Appendix F.) [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:22 am
Resources Code, §§ 21159.21(f), 21159.22(b)(3), 21159.23(a)(2)(A), 21159.24(a)(1), (3), 21155.1(a)(4)(B)) also constitute “exceptions to the general rule that CEQA [does] not require an evaluation of existing hazards on future users of a proposed project. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 11:00 am
And although the [F]EIR at least offered some figures about current and anticipated VMT around Lake Tahoe, it never clearly explained how all of these figures related to the Lake. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:25 pm
(providing that “[i]f possible, a well should be located outside areas of flooding”; and 9 (requiring a well’s “annular space” be “effectively sealed” and establishing minimum subface seal depths). [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:26 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 12:40 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
In a much-anticipated decision filed August 5, 2013, the California Supreme Court held that CEQA requires a lead agency to assess a project’s environmental impacts against an “existing conditions” baseline – and consequently disallows sole reliance on a “future conditions” baseline – unless the agency shows “by substantial evidence that an analysis based on existing conditions would tend to be misleading or without informational value to… [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:33 pm
In a published decision filed October 31, 2014 (Paulek v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 3:28 pm
As all CEQA practitioners know, a prospective petitioner in a writ proceeding challenging a CEQA determination must first exhaust available administrative remedies as a prerequisite to filing suit. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:04 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 11:46 am
In a lengthy published opinion filed May 21, 2013, the First District Court of Appeal reversed a judgment granting a writ of mandate and upheld as legally adequate under CEQA the Marin Municipal Water District’s EIR for development and construction of a desalination plant in Marin County. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 2:17 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:12 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am
The 2021-2022 Legislative Session was light on CEQA amendments, and once again did not produce any significant reform. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 4:14 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:21 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]