Search for: "Arthur F. Coon" Results 221 - 240 of 448
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2016, 8:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
Resources Code, §§ 21159.21(f), 21159.22(b)(3), 21159.23(a)(2)(A), 21159.24(a)(1), (3), 21155.1(a)(4)(B)) also constitute “exceptions to the general rule that CEQA [does] not require an evaluation of existing hazards on future users of a proposed project. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
(providing that “[i]f possible, a well should be located outside areas of flooding”; and 9 (requiring a well’s “annular space” be “effectively sealed” and establishing minimum subface seal depths). [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a much-anticipated decision filed August 5, 2013, the California Supreme Court held that CEQA requires a lead agency to assess a project’s environmental impacts against an “existing conditions” baseline – and consequently disallows sole reliance on a “future conditions” baseline  –  unless the agency shows “by substantial evidence that an analysis based on existing conditions would tend to be misleading or without informational value to… [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 3:28 pm by Matthew C. Henderson and Arthur F. Coon
As all CEQA practitioners know, a prospective petitioner in a writ proceeding challenging a CEQA determination must first exhaust available administrative remedies as a prerequisite to filing suit. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 11:46 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a lengthy published opinion filed May 21, 2013, the First District Court of Appeal reversed a judgment granting a writ of mandate and upheld as legally adequate under CEQA the Marin Municipal Water District’s EIR for development and construction of a desalination plant in Marin County. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am by Arielle Harris
The 2021-2022 Legislative Session was light on CEQA amendments, and once again did not produce any significant reform. [read post]