Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 221 - 240
of 422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2017, 10:08 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:59 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 9:10 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 4:10 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 1:32 pm
In an opinion filed November 29, and belatedly ordered published on December 22, 2016, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s denial of a writ petition challenging on CEQA grounds the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s (Muni) approval of a light rail construction contract. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
In an opinion filed December 7, and later ordered published on December 16, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment denying a writ petition on the “single legal issue” whether plaintiffs were entitled under Public Resources Code § 21151(c) (and a municipal code section with essentially the same content) to an appeal of a planning commission’s “substantial conformance review” (SCR) determination to the city council. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
In a lengthy published opinion filed November 29, 2016, the First District Court of Appeal rejected all legal challenges to the City of San Francisco’s Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) and related land use approvals for a 488,000-square-foot multipurpose event center project on 11 acres in the City’s Mission Bay South redevelopment plan area (the “Project”). [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:05 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
Such impacts are traditionally measured – as was the case here – with the LOS A to F scale, where A is free flowing and F is congested “stop and go” traffic. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 5:02 pm
In a 29-page published opinion filed October 14, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal dispensed some good news to municipalities desiring to reasonably regulate retail medical marijuana facilities within their jurisdictional boundaries. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 10:59 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:52 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm
“… like all things in life, project plans are subject to change. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:02 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 1:52 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm
In a published opinion filed August 31, 2016, the Sixth Appellate District Court of Appeal rejected claims under CEQA and the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (“SMARA”; Pub. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 3:42 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 1:36 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:22 am
Resources Code, §§ 21159.21(f), 21159.22(b)(3), 21159.23(a)(2)(A), 21159.24(a)(1), (3), 21155.1(a)(4)(B)) also constitute “exceptions to the general rule that CEQA [does] not require an evaluation of existing hazards on future users of a proposed project. [read post]
