Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 241 - 260
of 443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2015, 1:50 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:57 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 11:55 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
On August 10, 2023 the Sixth District Court of Appeal filed its published opinion in Santa Rita Union School District v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
The same appellate panel that decided the controversial Berkeley Hillside Preservation case (which is currently in the briefing stage of Supreme Court review) rendered another significant categorical exemption decision in its recently published opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 4:07 pm
“Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 1:44 pm
On September 13, 2011, I began the endeavor of writing Miller Starr Regalia’s CEQA Developments blog. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:11 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:26 pm
In a published opinion filed January 31, 2018, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial Court’s judgment issuing a writ of mandate voiding the California State Air Resources Board’s (“CARB”) 2014 amendments to its 2008 Truck and Bus Regulation and its related environmental review documents, which were the functional equivalent of a negative declaration under CARB’s certified regulatory program. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
In an opinion filed December 7, and later ordered published on December 16, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment denying a writ petition on the “single legal issue” whether plaintiffs were entitled under Public Resources Code § 21151(c) (and a municipal code section with essentially the same content) to an appeal of a planning commission’s “substantial conformance review” (SCR) determination to the city council. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 11:29 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:25 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 1:39 pm
CEQA’s Class 32 categorical exemption for “infill development” applies to proposed developments within city limits on sites of five or fewer acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, where the site has no habitat value for special status species, can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services, and the project would not have significant traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality impacts. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:26 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]