Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 261 - 280
of 472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2018, 2:28 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 11:18 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 3:28 pm
As all CEQA practitioners know, a prospective petitioner in a writ proceeding challenging a CEQA determination must first exhaust available administrative remedies as a prerequisite to filing suit. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:25 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 2:17 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
The same appellate panel that decided the controversial Berkeley Hillside Preservation case (which is currently in the briefing stage of Supreme Court review) rendered another significant categorical exemption decision in its recently published opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:55 pm
In a brief – and somewhat odd – opinion filed April 22, and belatedly ordered partially published on May 20, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging a General Plan Amendment (GPA) adopted by the City of Palm Springs as categorically exempt from CEQA. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:12 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 1:50 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:02 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 4:07 pm
“Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:35 pm
In a published decision filed May 28, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed that part of the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate and otherwise affirmed the judgment, thus upholding the City of San Diego’s Balboa Park revitalization project (“Project”) against various land use law and CEQA challenges. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
In an opinion recently ordered published, the First District Court of Appeal extensively reviewed the relevant case law and expressed skepticism that CEQA would operate in reverse to require analysis of potential impacts on a mixed-use project’s construction workers and future residents from pre-existing soil contamination at the project site. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:38 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 1:44 pm
On September 13, 2011, I began the endeavor of writing Miller Starr Regalia’s CEQA Developments blog. [read post]