Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 261 - 280
of 443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2013, 11:18 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:45 pm
On February 27, 2023, the Second District Court of Appeal (Division One) filed its published decision in Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 11:06 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm
In a 38-page opinion filed May 4, and belatedly ordered published on May 25, 2017, the Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed a judgment dismissing a writ petition filed by three environmental groups alleging CEQA violations against the California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) in connection with its issuance of 214 individual permits for new oil wells in the long-established South Belridge Oil Field in Kern County. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:23 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm
The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments in an important case we’ve been following involving CEQA’s definition of a “project” on the afternoon of June 4, 2019, and took the matter under submission. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
The same appellate panel that decided the controversial Berkeley Hillside Preservation case (which is currently in the briefing stage of Supreme Court review) rendered another significant categorical exemption decision in its recently published opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 3:18 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
In an opinion recently ordered published, the First District Court of Appeal extensively reviewed the relevant case law and expressed skepticism that CEQA would operate in reverse to require analysis of potential impacts on a mixed-use project’s construction workers and future residents from pre-existing soil contamination at the project site. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:24 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 3:13 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:37 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:35 pm
In a published decision filed May 28, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed that part of the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate and otherwise affirmed the judgment, thus upholding the City of San Diego’s Balboa Park revitalization project (“Project”) against various land use law and CEQA challenges. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 2:17 pm
A unanimous Third District panel upheld SiskiyouCounty’s EIR for Roseburg Forest Products Co. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:22 am
In an opinion filed June 28, 2023, and later ordered published on July 25, 2023, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 5) affirmed a judgment granting a writ of mandate setting aside (1) the City of Los Angeles’ (City) approval of a 10-story hotel project (with three levels of subterranean parking) to be located on a half-acre site in the Hollywood Community Plan area, and (2) the City’s accompanying determination that the hotel project was exempt under CEQA’s Class 32… [read post]
