Search for: "Arthur F. Coon" Results 261 - 280 of 443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2016, 8:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
Resources Code, §§ 21159.21(f), 21159.22(b)(3), 21159.23(a)(2)(A), 21159.24(a)(1), (3), 21155.1(a)(4)(B)) also constitute “exceptions to the general rule that CEQA [does] not require an evaluation of existing hazards on future users of a proposed project. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 10:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
A project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a “historical resource” may, for that reason, have a significant effect on the environment for purposes of CEQA. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 11:25 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a 58-page published opinion filed June 30, 2016, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment upholding the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC) and Association of Bay Area Government’s (ABAG) EIR for and approval of “Plan Bay Area,” the agencies’ first Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) prepared pursuant to California’s landmark “Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of… [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a decision filed May 25, and belatedly ordered published June 15, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed and reversed in part a judgment of the San Bernardino County Superior Court. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a brief – and somewhat odd – opinion filed April 22, and belatedly ordered partially published on May 20, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging a General Plan Amendment (GPA) adopted by the City of Palm Springs as categorically exempt from CEQA. [read post]
4 May 2016, 3:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (For my prior post briefly describing the case’s facts, legal issues and significance, see “Supreme Court Set to Hear Important CEQA Subsequent Review Case,” by Arthur F. [read post]