Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 281 - 300
of 438
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2016, 2:46 pm
Further, “[f]or many projects, a qualitative analysis of construction traffic may be appropriate. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:56 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 1:21 pm
In a lengthy opinion filed December 2, 2015, and belatedly ordered published on January 4, 2016, the Third District Court of Appeal invalidated the California Department of Food and Agriculture’s (CDFA) programmatic EIR for a seven-year program to eradicate an invasive pest – an Australian native insect known as the light brown apple moth (LBAM) – that threatens California’s native plants and agricultural crops. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:45 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 10:25 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:48 pm
In a 5-2 decision filed November 30, 2015, the California Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeal which had upheld the EIS/EIR for the controversial Newhall Ranch development project. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 11:41 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
The First District Court of Appeal held the California State Lands Commission’s (“CSLC”) EIR for a project involving the lease of sovereign lands beneath San Francisco Bay for private dredge mining of sand complied with CEQA; however, it partially reversed the trial court’s judgment denying a writ because the record failed to demonstrate CSLC’s compliance with the public trust doctrine. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:09 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
On remand following a landmark California Supreme Court decision, the First District Court of Appeal filed its opinion affirming the trial court’s judgment on September 23 and later ordered it published on October 15, 2015. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
In a 65-page opinion certified for publication and filed October 22, 2015, the Second Appellate District Court of Appeal affirmed the Los Angeles County Superior Court’s judgment denying writ petitions by the City of Beverly Hills (“City”) and the Beverly Hills Unified School District (“District”). [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:13 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
On September 18 and October 5, 2015, I posted Parts I and II, respectively, of my comments on OPR’s August 11, 2015 Preliminary Discussion Draft of its “Proposed Updates to the CEQA Guidelines” (the “Discussion Draft”). [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 11:27 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
(Guidance on information that may be included in such an analysis is presented in Appendix F.) [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:59 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
In a published decision filed September 17, 2015, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate and finding that a proposed land exchange agreement was not statutorily exempt from CEQA review. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
., at 111, citing Maureen F. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:41 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
