Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 301 - 320
of 443
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
(Guidance on information that may be included in such an analysis is presented in Appendix F.) [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:59 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
In a published decision filed September 17, 2015, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate and finding that a proposed land exchange agreement was not statutorily exempt from CEQA review. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
., at 111, citing Maureen F. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:41 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
” by Arthur F. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:12 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
In a 47-page published decision filed June 17, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment denying a writ petition, and held that Respondent Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (“Agency”) must comply with CEQA before “refining” its Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (“MSHCP”) to exclude a 200-acre parcel of ranch land owned by Anheuser-Busch, LLC (“Busch”) from its protections against… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:35 pm
In a published decision filed May 28, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed that part of the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate and otherwise affirmed the judgment, thus upholding the City of San Diego’s Balboa Park revitalization project (“Project”) against various land use law and CEQA challenges. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 11:06 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:41 am
In a published opinion filed May 20, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment granting mandate relief based on a general plan violation, affirmed its denial of relief under CEQA, and thereby upheld the City of Newport Beach’s approval of a mixed-use development within the coastal zone on the 400-acre Banning Ranch property. [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
The Court of Appeal’s Application Of The “Fair Argument” Test The Court of Appeal observed that CEQA provides no “ironclad definition” of what constitutes a significant effect and that “[i]f there is disagreement among expert opinion supported by facts …. the Lead Agency shall treat the effect as significant and shall prepare an EIR” (citing 14 Cal. [read post]
5 May 2015, 5:03 pm
I recall that Mike Zischke, co-author of CEB’s excellent CEQA treatise, used to be fond of saying the “normal” or “usual rules” for analyzing cumulative impacts should apply to analysis of a project’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under CEQA. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 1:50 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 4:10 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
