Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 321 - 340
of 464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
In a 65-page opinion certified for publication and filed October 22, 2015, the Second Appellate District Court of Appeal affirmed the Los Angeles County Superior Court’s judgment denying writ petitions by the City of Beverly Hills (“City”) and the Beverly Hills Unified School District (“District”). [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:13 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
On September 18 and October 5, 2015, I posted Parts I and II, respectively, of my comments on OPR’s August 11, 2015 Preliminary Discussion Draft of its “Proposed Updates to the CEQA Guidelines” (the “Discussion Draft”). [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 11:27 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
(Guidance on information that may be included in such an analysis is presented in Appendix F.) [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:59 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
In a published decision filed September 17, 2015, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate and finding that a proposed land exchange agreement was not statutorily exempt from CEQA review. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
., at 111, citing Maureen F. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:41 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
” by Arthur F. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:12 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
In a 47-page published decision filed June 17, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment denying a writ petition, and held that Respondent Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (“Agency”) must comply with CEQA before “refining” its Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (“MSHCP”) to exclude a 200-acre parcel of ranch land owned by Anheuser-Busch, LLC (“Busch”) from its protections against… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:35 pm
In a published decision filed May 28, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed that part of the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate and otherwise affirmed the judgment, thus upholding the City of San Diego’s Balboa Park revitalization project (“Project”) against various land use law and CEQA challenges. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 11:06 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:41 am
In a published opinion filed May 20, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment granting mandate relief based on a general plan violation, affirmed its denial of relief under CEQA, and thereby upheld the City of Newport Beach’s approval of a mixed-use development within the coastal zone on the 400-acre Banning Ranch property. [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
The Court of Appeal’s Application Of The “Fair Argument” Test The Court of Appeal observed that CEQA provides no “ironclad definition” of what constitutes a significant effect and that “[i]f there is disagreement among expert opinion supported by facts …. the Lead Agency shall treat the effect as significant and shall prepare an EIR” (citing 14 Cal. [read post]
