Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 361 - 380
of 472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
In a decision filed December 2, and later ordered published on December 30, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Mendocino County Superior Court’s judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging a Nonindustrial Timber Management Plan (NTMP) for 615 acres adjacent to Gualala. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:17 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:44 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm
Coon, posted December 1, 2014.) [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:52 pm
In a 2-1 published opinion filed November 24, 2014, the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division 1, affirmed and modified the trial court’s judgment granting writ petitions by plaintiff groups challenging the EIR for the San Diego Association of Governments’ (SANDAG) 2050 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2050 RTP/SCS). [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:15 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:48 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:33 pm
In a published decision filed October 31, 2014 (Paulek v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:40 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 11:35 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm
Coon, posted 8/4/14.) [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 11:29 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 1:36 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:55 pm
’” (Quoting § 21167.6(f).) [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
” Significantly, the Court pointedly rejected plaintiffs’ attempted reliance on an earlier court of appeal precedent for the asserted principle that “[f]ailure to comply with the CEQA procedures is necessarily prejudicial[,]” noting that statement “does not comport with either CEQA section 21005 or with the Supreme Court’s decision in Neighbors for Smart Rail [v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am
In a lengthy, mostly-unpublished opinion filed on August 14, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the superior court’s judgment denying a writ petition challenging the Parkmerced Development Project. [read post]