Search for: "Ashcroft v. al-Kidd" Results 1 - 20 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2011, 3:22 pm
On May 31, 2011 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:48 pm by Orin Kerr
Al-Kidd has sued John Ashcroft under the Fourth Amendment for Ashcroft’s policy of using the material witness statute for purposes of national security detention. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:39 pm by Orin Kerr
I blogged my reaction to the panel opinion, on the constitutionality of material witness detention for terrorism purposes, here: al-Kidd v. [read post]
" In Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, we seek to hold former Attorney General John Ashcroft responsible for the detention of Abdullah al-Kidd, an innocent American citizen who was wrongfully imprisoned under the material witness statute. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:52 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Next week, the Supreme Court will be hearing oral argument in Ashcroft v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:25 am by Joe Consumer
That was the somewhat contradictory outcome in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (docket 10-98). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:25 am by Joe Consumer
That was the somewhat contradictory outcome in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (docket 10-98). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:13 am by Glenn Reynolds
WES OLIVER, who’s visiting here at Tennessee this semester, has a post on Ashcroft v. al-Kidd and Material Witness Detention. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:17 pm by Josh Blackman
In al-Kidd–beyond the relatively straightforward issue of qualified immunity–the primary dispute between Justice Scalia and Justice Ginsburg dealt with the pretextual 16-day detention of al-Kidd. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:17 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I attended oral argument this morning in Ashcroft v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
Continuing with my thoughts on the Ninth Circuit decision in al-Kidd v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:51 pm
9th Rules Ashcroft Can Be Held Liable for Post-9/11 Detentions :: Al-Kidd v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:46 am by Zach Zagger
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd [Cornell LII Backgrounder] that a witness in a terror investigation cannot challenge the constitutionality of an objectively reasonable arrest pursuant to a validly obtained warrant even if the government did not call or had no intention of calling the witness for trial. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:32 am by Ted Frank
SCOTUSblog: "The Court limited its review of the new terrorism case (Ashcroft v. [read post]