Search for: "Ashwell v. Ashwell"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2008, 5:32 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jeleniewicz v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1163 (23 October 2008) James v Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1158 (23 October 2008) Harding v Revenue & Customs [2008] EWCA Civ 1164 (23 October 2008) Parris v Williams [2008] EWCA Civ 1147 (23 October 2008) Ashwell Property Group Plc & Anor v Cambridge City Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1151 (22 October 2008) High… [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:15 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) F (Mongolia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 769 (25 July 2007) North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 (25 July 2007) Madan & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 770 (25 July 2007) London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 763 (25 July 2007) DS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 774 (25 July… [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 4:01 am
Bertoldi v. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 4:36 am
The case, Stone and Ashwell (trading as Tyre 20) v Fleet Mobile Tyres Limited [2006] EWCA Civ 1209, was more a contract dispute than an IP matter.Left: how fashions in tyre branding change - the comfort of Bibendum gives way to the harsh modernity of eTyresEssentially, Fleet (the franchisor) was taking a bigger percentage on the sale of eTyres that were bought on its website and then fitted by Tyre 20 (the franchisee). [read post]
