Search for: "Askew v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  In the long litany of head-scratching moments emerging from our growing knowledge about the highest-ranking Republican in the United States government, I was both confused and amused when I saw this in The Guardian. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 1:37 am by CMS
The issues before the Court of Appeal were whether Richard Lloyd should be granted permission to serve the claim out of the jurisdiction on Google in the United States, and whether the claim should be permitted to proceed under CPR 19.6. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:39 am by Eric Goldman
In the United States, copyright law principally serves as an economic policy by protecting creators’ ability to recoup the investments they make in generating new works that have value to society. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:41 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 3:45 am by SHG
United States, which created the reasonable expectation of privacy test, to serve as a viable basis to protect our privacy rights. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
 Oh, and let's return briefly to the 1709 Blog: While the United States has its Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator (IPEC: here, with links to earlier posts), most of Europe seems to be missing the point, assuming that the way to deal with the big anti-counterfeiting issues is for more pan-European cooperation between OHIM and national offices. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:39 pm by Tasha C. Taylor
Arnold, who sat as a judge and later as Chief Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:53 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
United States, 129 S.Ct. 695 (2009), the Supreme Court said that not all improperly-seized evidence needs to be suppressed. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]