Search for: "Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2017, 8:34 am by Eric Tsai
§ 506(a)(1) requires the use of “replacement value” based upon the adoption of the replacement value standard in Associates Commercial Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:08 pm by L. John Bird
Ultimately, Judge Shannon relied upon a number of persuasive authorities in reaching his decision:  Delaware law requires a mobile home owner to have a Title, like an automobile; the Supreme Court adopted the replacement value approach in Associates Commercial Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 12:20 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
  Quoting from In re Arnold and Baker Farms, 177 B.R. 648, 655 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1994) and Associates Commercial Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 12:20 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
  Quoting from In re Arnold and Baker Farms, 177 B.R. 648, 655 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1994) and Associates Commercial Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Coronavirus Outbreak Contributed to a Rash of Coronavirus Securities Suits and Other Claims The most significant development during 2020 was the outbreak and spread of COVID-19. [read post]