Search for: "Atkins v. Atkins" Results 21 - 40 of 888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2020, 12:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Perlin (New York Law School), Talia Roitberg Harmon (Niagara University), Sarah Wetzel (Niagara University), 'Man is Opposed to Fair Play': An Empirical Analysis of How the Fifth Circuit Has Failed to Take Seriously Atkins v. [read post]
25 Jul 2005, 11:49 am
[JURIST] Jury selection began today for the competency trial of Daryl Atkins, the plaintiff in the 2002 Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:10 am
  The Supreme Court of California take on this issue today in People v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 4:01 pm
Michael Atkins (a/k/a the Seattle Trademark Lawyer) has graciously offered to host "Meet the Bloggers V" at this year's INTA Annual Meeting in Seattle.Date: Monday, May 18 Time: 6-9 p.m. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 1:00 am
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Virginia [official website] has ordered [text, PDF; summary] a new trial for death row inmate Daryl Atkins, instructing the trial court to determine whether Atkins is mentally retarded and therefore ineligible for the death penalty [JURIST news archive] after the 2002 US Supreme Court ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:04 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Ellis (University of New Mexico - School of Law) has posted Hall v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:49 am by Jon Sands
[Ed. note: The Arizona FPD represented the codefendant in this case.]Smith v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:26 pm
Blume asserted that Ashe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:17 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
A State court’s determination that a defendant’s mental retardation was a mitigating factor in the penalty phase of a capital case does not trigger Double Jeopardy issue preclusion, and foreclose the question whether, in the wake of the subsequently-decided decision in Atkins v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:43 pm
It's unconstitutional to execute people with mental retardation, the Court said in Atkins v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:35 am
Something else I missed last week was this interesting Employment Appeal Tribunal case, dealing with the fairness of a dismissal during paternity leave. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 12:41 am
. - Five years after the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]