Search for: "Atkins v. Virginia"
Results 241 - 260
of 437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 8:01 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:35 pm
Virginia -- is contrary to or an unreasonable application of Atkins v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm
In the beginning, there was Atkins v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:43 am
In the beginning, there was Atkins v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:56 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Atkins v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled that the imposition of the death penalty on the mentally retarded constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution (Atkins v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:56 pm
Virginia (2002), juveniles in Roper v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:52 am
Wainwright, then extending that ban to the mentally retarded with Atkins v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:40 am
Ten years ago, in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:33 am
Virginia. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
The mentally retarded were also shielded from execution by the 2002 decision in Atkins v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm
Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that the execution of those with mental retardation is unconstitutional; more on Atkins v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm
Florida; Atkins v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:40 am
Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that the execution of those with mental retardation is unconstitutional; more on Atkins v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 9:14 am
., who had challenged the timing and use of the jury in adjudicating his claim of death penalty ineligibility under Atkins v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:52 pm
As to the subjective prong, Trigilio and Casadio observe that the Court’s cases since Atkins v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:44 pm
As to the subjective prong, Trigilio and Casadio observe that the Court’s cases since Atkins v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:40 pm
As to the subjective prong, Trigilio and Casadio observe that the Court’s cases since Atkins v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:56 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]