Search for: "Atkins v. Virginia"
Results 141 - 160
of 440
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2015, 11:50 am
Lynaugh that intellectual disability in that range should be considered as a mitigating factor to be weighed in the balance, not a trump card.Even so, in Atkins v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Monday over how to apply the court's 2002 decision Atkins v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:35 am
Virginia barring the execution of mentally disabled individuals convicted of murder. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 6:22 am
The basis for each of these prohibitions is the 8th Amendment's ban of cruel and unusual punishment.Mental disability made the list via the 2002 decision in Atkins v Virginia. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:38 am
In its decision in 2002 in Atkins v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:32 am
Atkins [Atkins v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:10 am
Daryl Renard Atkins was on death row in Virginia. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 6:11 pm
Here is the abstract: The holding in Atkins v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 5:10 pm
Atkins v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:19 am
Década de 2000 Atkins v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm
Virginia that retardation would be a categorical exclusion after all. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:54 am
As Justice Scalia pointed out in his dissent in Atkins v. [read post]
