Search for: "Atkins v. Virginia" Results 141 - 160 of 374
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am by Maureen Johnston
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:54 am by Steve Erickson
  As Justice Scalia pointed out in his dissent in Atkins v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am by Maureen Johnston
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:17 pm by Maureen Johnston
Virginia has based its decision on an unreasonable determination of facts under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:07 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered that filing for this blog; other coverage comes from Kimberly Atkins of the Boston Herald. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court had yet to announce the constitutional rule, under Atkins v. [read post]