Search for: "Atkinson v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2020, 7:52 am by Eric Goldman
However, the court says: Atkinson pleads no specific facts about which members of the United States government pressured Facebook, how they did so, or any causal connection between the alleged pressure and Facebook’s actions. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:37 am by Andrew Hamm
., the Center for Migration Studies will host a series of discussions on United States v. [read post]
On Tuesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit addressed the question of whether the 1962 U.S. [read post]
On Tuesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit addressed the question of whether the 1962 U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:12 am by Christopher J. Slottee
Smart held that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm by Eliot Kim
Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision, pursuant to its 1998 holding in Atkinson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 10:30 am by Eric Goldman
Selected Related Posts About State Action Claims Facebook Isn’t a Constructive Public Trust–Cameron Atkinson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:20 am by Embassy Law
Court of Appeals was made for different reasons.The District Court based its ruling on the precedent of Atkinson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
” Therefore, the resignation could not be withdrawn without the board’s consent.In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly8 the decision reports that the then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]