Search for: "Atlantic Richfield Company"
Results 1 - 20
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 2:06 pm
Atlantic Richfield Company 22-1207Issue: Whether a district court’s equitable allocation of environmental-response costs pursuant to Section 113(f)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act is properly reviewed on appeal only for clear error or for abuse of discretion. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:00 am
On May 5, 2023 in Atlantic Richfield Company, et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:28 am
Atlantic Richfield Co., 990 F.2d 202 (5th Cir. 1993). [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:36 am
Atlantic Richfield Company, 51 F.3d 1421 (9th Cir. 1995). [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
Atlantic Richfield has now filed an amicus brief supporting the United States in the Guam case because a three-year statute of limitations would bar another company (Asarco) from recovering millions from Atlantic Richfield in a contribution action. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 11:20 am
Atlantic Richfield – Second place goes to the Butte Priority Soils Operable Unit consent decree, which requires Atlantic Richfield to pay for the cleanup of mining-related contamination to the tune of $150 million. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 11:16 am
Atlantic Richfield Co., 51 F.3d 1421, 1433 (9th Cir. 1995). [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
In the recent case before the Supreme Court, the Atlantic Richfield Company insisted that CERCLA should largely preempt this long history of Montana law and that the case should be dismissed on jurisdictional grounds. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
In Monsanto’s motion to dismiss, the company alleged that the District failed to prove where Monsanto was obligated to respond or monitor for PCBs under its Stormwater Permit and where the District has been injured as a result of the alleged release of PCBs into San Diego Bay. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 6:29 am
Atlantic Richfield Company acquired the financially troubled smelter in the 1970s but could not reverse its decline, and closed it by 1980. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:22 am
Over the past 35 years, EPA has worked with the current owner of the now-closed smelter, Atlantic Richfield Company, to implement a cleanup plan for a remediation expected to continue through 2025. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am
This week, in a split 7-2 opinion authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court held that Montana state law claims brought by private landowners against Atlantic Richfield Company (“ARCO”) for alleged impacts from the Anaconda Smelter Superfund site are not preempted by CERCLA and are not precluded by ARCO’s settlement of EPA’s CERCLA claims; however, any restoration damages awarded to the landowners must be spent on actual restoration of the… [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am
This week, in a split 7-2 opinion authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court held that Montana state law claims brought by private landowners against Atlantic Richfield Company (“ARCO”) for alleged impacts from the Anaconda Smelter Superfund site are not preempted by CERCLA and are not precluded by ARCO’s settlement of EPA’s CERCLA claims; however, any restoration damages awarded to the landowners must be spent on actual restoration of the… [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
At Foley Hoag’s Law & the Environment blog, Seth Jaffe writes that Monday’s decision in Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 6:22 pm
“Supreme Court Rules Against Landowners in Montana Superfund Fight; Landowners may not sue the Atlantic Richfield Company to force it to do more than a federal cleanup plan requires unless the Environmental Protection Agency consents, the court ruled”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 6:05 am
The US Supreme Court issued its decision in Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
” In Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:21 pm
The case pits Atlantic Richfield Co., which owned the smelter when it shut down in 1980 and has spent nearly a half-billion dollars cleaning up the site following an EPA plan, against local landowners, who want the company to spend roughly $50 million more to return their properties to their original condition. [read post]
