Search for: "Atlantic Richfield Company" Results 21 - 40 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
Atlantic Richfield Company, et. al., is making headlines this week as expert witness testimony is being heard in Santa Clara County Superior Court. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 4:20 pm by Jon Gelman
Plaintiffs say it would cost $2.4 billion if implemented by the defendants.Their plan calls for the creation of a fund administered by the public entities.Defendant companies — Sherwin-Williams, NL Industries, ConAgra Grocery Products, DuPont and Atlantic Richfield Company — are expected to fiercely defend their position, saying plaintiffs did not meet a necessary test set forth by the state’s Sixth District Court of Appeal.The paint… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:21 pm by Jon Gelman
Atlantic Richfield Company, et al.Superior Court of California, County of Santa ClaraCase No. 1-00-CV-788657Found onRelated articlesPlaintiffs' expert says lead paint abatement could cost $1.4 billion (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Occupational exposure to lead paintLots of data to process for Calif. lead paint judge (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Judge again asks sides to settle in Calif. lead paint case (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)California cities seek $1… [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:26 am by Jon Gelman
Defendants NL Industries, the Sherwin-Williams Company, ConAgra Grocery Products, DuPont and Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), claim the suit is without merit, that blood lead levels in California are close to zero and that other exposures, such as gasoline, are more likely to elevate blood lead levels than lead paint.Congress banned lead-based paints in the U.S. in 1978, but plaintiffs contend the paint remains in millions of homes and is the... [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:30 pm
Superior Court (Atlantic Richfield Co.), ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Apr. 8, 2008) (Sixth Appellate District) ("Santa Clara"). [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:09 am by Jon Gelman
Atlantic Richfield Company, et al.Superior Court of California, County of Santa ClaraCase No. 1-00-CV-788657Found onRelated articlesFirms to pay $1.1-billion in long-running lead paint lawsuit (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Calif. judge denies Sherwin Williams motion in lead paint trial (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Sides rest in Calif. lead paint trial (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Judge: Paint companies to pay Calif. cities $1.1B… [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 1:06 pm by WIMS
The Court of Federal Claims initially entered judgment in favor of all four plaintiffs in this litigation: Shell Oil Company, Atlantic Richfield Company, Texaco Inc., and Union Oil Company of California (collectively, the Oil Companies). [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 1:02 am by Jon Gelman
He leased an Atlantic Richfield station in San Francisco in 1970, then moved his business to a Beacon station in St. [read post]
16 May 2007, 6:39 pm
Atlantic Richfield Company, No. 1-00-CV-788657, slip op. at 2 (Cal. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:47 am by Ben Vernia
.), Amoco Production Company, BP Exploration & Oil Inc., BP America Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and Vastar (the BP defendants) have agreed to pay the United States $20.5 million to resolve claims that the companies violated the False Claims Act by knowingly underpaying royalties owed on natural gas produced from federal and Indian leases, the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:32 am by Jon Gelman
Atlantic Richfield Company, et al., Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. 1-00-CV-788657. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 1:21 am by Jon Gelman
Hess Corporation, on its own behalf and on behalf of Atlantic Richfield ... [read post]