Search for: "Atlantic Richfield Company" Results 61 - 80 of 101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2013, 3:09 am by Jon Gelman
Atlantic Richfield Company, et al.Superior Court of California, County of Santa ClaraCase No. 1-00-CV-788657Found onRelated articlesFirms to pay $1.1-billion in long-running lead paint lawsuit (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Calif. judge denies Sherwin Williams motion in lead paint trial (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Sides rest in Calif. lead paint trial (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Judge: Paint companies to pay Calif. cities $1.1B… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:21 pm by Jon Gelman
Atlantic Richfield Company, et al.Superior Court of California, County of Santa ClaraCase No. 1-00-CV-788657Found onRelated articlesPlaintiffs' expert says lead paint abatement could cost $1.4 billion (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Occupational exposure to lead paintLots of data to process for Calif. lead paint judge (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Judge again asks sides to settle in Calif. lead paint case (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)California cities seek $1… [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:15 pm by Jon Gelman
Atlantic Richfield Co. et. al., which seeks to hold five defendant paint companies liable for an alleged lead paint public nuisance in 10 county and municipal jurisdictions in the state. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 4:20 pm by Jon Gelman
Plaintiffs say it would cost $2.4 billion if implemented by the defendants.Their plan calls for the creation of a fund administered by the public entities.Defendant companies — Sherwin-Williams, NL Industries, ConAgra Grocery Products, DuPont and Atlantic Richfield Company — are expected to fiercely defend their position, saying plaintiffs did not meet a necessary test set forth by the state’s Sixth District Court of Appeal.The paint… [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:26 am by Jon Gelman
Defendants NL Industries, the Sherwin-Williams Company, ConAgra Grocery Products, DuPont and Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), claim the suit is without merit, that blood lead levels in California are close to zero and that other exposures, such as gasoline, are more likely to elevate blood lead levels than lead paint.Congress banned lead-based paints in the U.S. in 1978, but plaintiffs contend the paint remains in millions of homes and is the... [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
Atlantic Richfield Company, et. al., is making headlines this week as expert witness testimony is being heard in Santa Clara County Superior Court. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
Atlantic Richfield Company et al regarding lead-based paint as a source of lead poisoning. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 7:00 am
Atlantic Richfield Company et al. include the Atlantic Richfield Company, the Sherwin-Williams Company, ConAgra Grocery Products, and DuPont. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 1:21 am by Jon Gelman
Hess Corporation, on its own behalf and on behalf of Atlantic Richfield ... [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
An Overview of the Lead Paint Lawsuit This week, the Oakland Tribune released a report examining a lawsuit brought by ten California cities (including San Francisco county and the city of Oakland) against paint manufacturers (including Sherwin-Williams and Atlantic Richfield). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Sander Greenland and others have raised various theoretical objections to the argument that relative risks should exceed two before attribution can be made in specific cases. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 1:06 pm by WIMS
The Court of Federal Claims initially entered judgment in favor of all four plaintiffs in this litigation: Shell Oil Company, Atlantic Richfield Company, Texaco Inc., and Union Oil Company of California (collectively, the Oil Companies). [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:11 pm by Todd Zywicki
 Oil companies, including Atlantic Richfield and Chevron, contribute to environmental groups such as the National Audubon Society, who lobby to restrict opening new areas for drilling, thereby keeping new supplies off the market. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:47 am by Ben Vernia
.), Amoco Production Company, BP Exploration & Oil Inc., BP America Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and Vastar (the BP defendants) have agreed to pay the United States $20.5 million to resolve claims that the companies violated the False Claims Act by knowingly underpaying royalties owed on natural gas produced from federal and Indian leases, the Justice Department announced today. [read post]