Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court" Results 81 - 100 of 3,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 1:18 pm
Or one very popular candidate could conceivably run for Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, Controller, and Treasurer at the same election, win them all, and then resign from all but the Governor’s office and appoint their friends to other statewide offices. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 12:40 pm
While they are not strictly related to the UCL, they do sound very interesting, especially the second one, which addresses attorneys' fees under the private attorney general doctrine of Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5: ROSS (GARY) v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
The Superior Court of San Joaquin County (Angelo Dairy). [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:02 pm
 Either generally or in specific cases.But I nonetheless agree with Justice Mauro here. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:42 pm by Medicare Set Aside Services
In an opinion from January 2011, finally released for publication last week, the New Jersey Superior Court ruled that attorney's fees could be taken from a Medicare Set-Aside. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:07 am by Howard Friedman
On September 23, 2022, the Pima County Superior Court granted the Attorney General’s motion solely based on the decision in Dobbs overruling Roe v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:17 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
” Injunctions At issue in Stress-Crete was whether the strict criteria needed to obtain an injunction, determined in RJR-MacDonald Inc., v Canada (Attorney General), 1 SCR 311 (“RJR”), had been fulfilled by the supposed breach of contract committed by the employee. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:59 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
In a decision handed down yesterday the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a one-line Order denying a petition for allowance of appeal filed by an insurance company from the Superior Court’s decision in the case of Kline v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:12 am by Thomas Kaufman and Melissa Smith
Superior Court, in which it clarified the scope of discovery in actions brought under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004, Labor Code § 2698 et seq., also known as PAGA. [read post]