Search for: "Attorney General v. Travelers Ins. Co." Results 21 - 40 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
Sween, 54 F.3d 423, 424 (7th Cir. 1995) (“A loose factual connection between the claims is generally sufficient. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(This is even clearer in light of the Court’s correct decision in INS v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am by MOTP
Wells Fargo, the Court approved and enforced a contractual waiver of the 2-year statute of limitations applicable to deficiency claims, and judicially substituted the four-year statute of limitations generally applicable to suits on debt. [read post]