Search for: "Atwater v. Lago Vista" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2010, 10:12 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
City of Lago Vista (Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 79, p. 115, 2009) on SSRN. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
She was the soccer mom pulled over in 1997 in Lago Vista, Texas, and, after an ugly verbal exchange with the police officer, placed under arrest and taken to the police station. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:57 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Lago Vista, which held that law enforcement can arrest people for Class C misdemeanors for which the maximum penalty includes no jail time. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:46 am by Gritsforbreakfast
City of Lago Vista that police can make arrests for fine only offenses, so the new statute won't prevent people for going to jail over library fines. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Anyway, here are what I consider Perry's worst criminal-justice related vetoes:Maximizing police arrest powersPhoto via The EconomistSB 730 (2001): After the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am by Michael M. O'Hear
City of Lago Vista, in which the Court held that a full-blown custodial arrest may be made if the police have probable cause to suspect that even a low-level traffic violation has occurred. [read post]
16 May 2010, 1:07 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Lago Vista said that Texas law allows arrests for these violations at officers' discretion. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:24 am by Orin Kerr
As I see it, Florence is really a follow-up to Atwater v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 12:08 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
City of Lago Vista, which held that police can arrest people for offenses where the punishment is only a monetary fine - in this case a seat belt violation. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
City of Lago Vista), I'll bet somebody out there can top it. [read post]